Who Should Own the Brand: The Founder’s Dilemma
Choosing who will hold the certificate for a trademark is not just a formality, but a strategic decision that will determine your tax burden and asset security for years to come. A mistake at the start often costs a business the rights to its own name: in moments of corporate conflict or hostile takeovers, the legal owner of the trademark becomes the deciding factor. Professional trademark registration should begin with an understanding of your long-term goals—whether you are preparing the company for sale or planning to use the brand as a tool for passive income.
| Comparison Parameter | Owner — Individual | Owner — Company (LLC) |
|---|---|---|
| Level of Control | Absolute, independent of business status | Depends on share in authorized capital |
| Taxation | Royalty payments (PIT + military levy) | Amortization, corporate income tax |
| Investment Attractiveness | Lower (investors want TM on the balance sheet) | Higher (asset integrated into capital) |
| Risk of Asset Loss | Minimal during LLC bankruptcy | High, TM falls under liquidation mass |
Cash Flow Logic: The Royalty Path
When we analyze brand usage scenarios, the mechanism of profit generation becomes a key aspect. If you choose the path where an individual is the owner, your company uses the mark based on a license agreement. This creates a legal channel for royalty payments, which is often more advantageous than dividends in terms of speed and tax planning. In cases where rights belong to a legal entity, the brand becomes part of the company’s intangible assets, increasing its overall value but limiting the founder in directly receiving funds from using the name.
Below, we will break down how intellectual property rights work in the hands of an individual and what advantages this provides in crisis situations.
…
